Contacts
Info
Beyond the Horizon is a project that aims to dig a bit deeper than just the surface level that we are so used to with the legacy media while at...
show more
Beyond the Horizon is a project that aims to dig a bit deeper than just the surface level that we are so used to with the legacy media while at the same time attempting to side step the gaslighting and rhetoric in search of the truth. From the day to day news that dominates the headlines to more complex geopolitical issues that effect all of our lives, we will be exploring them all.
It's time to stop settling for what is force fed to us and it's time to look beyond the horizon.
show less
It's time to stop settling for what is force fed to us and it's time to look beyond the horizon.
Explicit
Transcribed
3 NOV 2024 · In May 2024, former model Crystal McKinney filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that he drugged and sexually assaulted her in 2003. According to McKinney, she met Combs during a Men's Fashion Week event in Manhattan, where he invited her to his recording studio later that evening. Upon arrival, she found Combs and several men consuming alcohol and marijuana. After partaking in what she believed was marijuana, McKinney began to feel disoriented, suspecting the substance was laced with another drug. She alleges that Combs then led her to a bathroom, where he forced her to perform oral sex. Following the assault, McKinney claims she lost consciousness and later awoke in a taxi, realizing she had been sexually assaulted.
McKinney's lawsuit was filed under New York's Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, which allows survivors to pursue civil action regardless of the statute of limitations. She also revealed that she preserved the clothing she wore that night, keeping it unwashed and stored in plastic for two decades, potentially serving as evidence. This lawsuit is among several allegations against Combs, who has faced multiple accusations of sexual misconduct and abuse. Combs' representatives have denied these allegations, asserting that they are baseless attempts to tarnish his reputation
(commercial at 7:17)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.621909/gov.uscourts.nysd.621909.19.0.pdf
Explicit
Transcribed
3 NOV 2024 · An order of the judgment of the court is a formal decision issued by a court at the end of a legal proceeding. It represents the court's final determination on the matters presented during the trial or hearing. Here's a summary of its key elements:
- Formal Decision: It is the official, written determination by the court on the issues presented in the case.
- Binding: The order is legally binding on the parties involved in the case, meaning they must comply with its terms.
- Content: It typically includes:
- The findings of fact: the court's conclusions about the facts of the case.
- The conclusions of law: the court's interpretation and application of the relevant laws to those facts.
- The final ruling: the court's decision on the relief or penalties, such as awarding damages, issuing injunctions, or imposing sentences.
- Implementation: It may direct specific actions to be taken by the parties, such as payment of money, transfer of property, or compliance with certain conditions.
- Appeal: Parties who are dissatisfied with the judgment may have the right to appeal to a higher court, seeking a review and possible reversal of the order.
The circus down in Delphi continues in this episode as we take a look at the scathing response by Richard Allen's legal team, letting Judge Gull know that they plan to call her as a witness. Â
(commercial at 7:41)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source
https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/2024-6-18-Delphi-Case-Defense-Response-to-Order-and-Notice-of-Conflict.pdf
Explicit
Transcribed
3 NOV 2024 · An order of the judgment of the court is a formal decision issued by a court at the end of a legal proceeding. It represents the court's final determination on the matters presented during the trial or hearing. Here's a summary of its key elements:
- Formal Decision: It is the official, written determination by the court on the issues presented in the case.
- Binding: The order is legally binding on the parties involved in the case, meaning they must comply with its terms.
- Content: It typically includes:
- The findings of fact: the court's conclusions about the facts of the case.
- The conclusions of law: the court's interpretation and application of the relevant laws to those facts.
- The final ruling: the court's decision on the relief or penalties, such as awarding damages, issuing injunctions, or imposing sentences.
- Implementation: It may direct specific actions to be taken by the parties, such as payment of money, transfer of property, or compliance with certain conditions.
- Appeal: Parties who are dissatisfied with the judgment may have the right to appeal to a higher court, seeking a review and possible reversal of the order.
The circus down in Delphi continues in this episode as we take a look at the scathing response by Richard Allen's legal team, letting Judge Gull know that they plan to call her as a witness. Â
(commercial at 7:41)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source
https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/2024-6-18-Delphi-Case-Defense-Response-to-Order-and-Notice-of-Conflict.pdf
Explicit
Transcribed
3 NOV 2024 · An order of the judgment of the court is a formal decision issued by a court at the end of a legal proceeding. It represents the court's final determination on the matters presented during the trial or hearing. Here's a summary of its key elements:
- Formal Decision: It is the official, written determination by the court on the issues presented in the case.
- Binding: The order is legally binding on the parties involved in the case, meaning they must comply with its terms.
- Content: It typically includes:
- The findings of fact: the court's conclusions about the facts of the case.
- The conclusions of law: the court's interpretation and application of the relevant laws to those facts.
- The final ruling: the court's decision on the relief or penalties, such as awarding damages, issuing injunctions, or imposing sentences.
- Implementation: It may direct specific actions to be taken by the parties, such as payment of money, transfer of property, or compliance with certain conditions.
- Appeal: Parties who are dissatisfied with the judgment may have the right to appeal to a higher court, seeking a review and possible reversal of the order.
The circus down in Delphi continues in this episode as we take a look at the scathing response by Richard Allen's legal team, letting Judge Gull know that they plan to call her as a witness. Â
(commercial at 7:41)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source
https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/2024-6-18-Delphi-Case-Defense-Response-to-Order-and-Notice-of-Conflict.pdf
Explicit
Transcribed
3 NOV 2024 · An order of the judgment of the court is a formal decision issued by a court at the end of a legal proceeding. It represents the court's final determination on the matters presented during the trial or hearing. Here's a summary of its key elements:
- Formal Decision: It is the official, written determination by the court on the issues presented in the case.
- Binding: The order is legally binding on the parties involved in the case, meaning they must comply with its terms.
- Content: It typically includes:
- The findings of fact: the court's conclusions about the facts of the case.
- The conclusions of law: the court's interpretation and application of the relevant laws to those facts.
- The final ruling: the court's decision on the relief or penalties, such as awarding damages, issuing injunctions, or imposing sentences.
- Implementation: It may direct specific actions to be taken by the parties, such as payment of money, transfer of property, or compliance with certain conditions.
- Appeal: Parties who are dissatisfied with the judgment may have the right to appeal to a higher court, seeking a review and possible reversal of the order.
The circus down in Delphi continues in this episode as we take a look at the scathing response by Richard Allen's legal team, letting Judge Gull know that they plan to call her as a witness. Â
(commercial at 7:41)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source
https://file///C:/Users/17024/Downloads/2024-6-18-Delphi-Case-Defense-Response-to-Order-and-Notice-of-Conflict.pdf
Explicit
Transcribed
2 NOV 2024 · We are learning more and more about the upcoming proceedings against Richard Allen in Delphi, Indiana today as the county has announced how much money they have allocated for the trial and all of the other things that come along with it.
In this episode, we take a look at some of those numbers and where the money is being earmarked.
(commercial at 8:49)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
https://fox59.com/indiana-news/delphi-double-murder-trial-costs-pegged-at-2-1m/
Explicit
Transcribed
2 NOV 2024 · Richard Allen and his legal team continue to try to chip away at the process as they seek loopholes and technicalities in order to get their client off and that hasn't changed in the latest filing.
In the lastest filing, Richard Allen not only complains once again about Odinism, but he also says that he should be able to have intimate visits with his wife. As you can imagine, the prosecution has other ideas.
(commercial at 7:40)Â
to contact me:
bobbbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/delphi-murder-suspect-expecting-intimate-privacy-in-a-prison-with-his-wife-is-astonishing-prosecutor/
Explicit
Transcribed
2 NOV 2024 · As we continue to navigate the many webs of the Delphi Murders, we are now being hit with a new piece of information that makes you question why it took so long for Richard Allen to be arrested. That information you ask? Richard Allen was known to investigators in 2017 but the information he voluntarily provided in the aftermath of the murders was lost due to, what authorities are calling "A clerical error."
Let's get caught up.
(commercial at 7:35)
to contact me:
https://protonmail.com
source:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/delphi-murders-suspect-richard-allen-slipped-through-net-in-2017-due-to-clerical-error-podcasters-reveal/ar-AA14Npa3?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=e9f7cb259b8f45deb34ad0941a3d165a
Explicit
Transcribed
2 NOV 2024 · In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.
Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.
(commercial at 7:45)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25260633/diddy.pdf
Explicit
Transcribed
2 NOV 2024 · In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.
Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.
(commercial at 7:45)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25260633/diddy.pdf
Beyond the Horizon is a project that aims to dig a bit deeper than just the surface level that we are so used to with the legacy media while at...
show more
Beyond the Horizon is a project that aims to dig a bit deeper than just the surface level that we are so used to with the legacy media while at the same time attempting to side step the gaslighting and rhetoric in search of the truth. From the day to day news that dominates the headlines to more complex geopolitical issues that effect all of our lives, we will be exploring them all.
It's time to stop settling for what is force fed to us and it's time to look beyond the horizon.
show less
It's time to stop settling for what is force fed to us and it's time to look beyond the horizon.
Information
| Author | Bobby Capucci |
| Organization | Bobby Capucci |
| Categories | News Commentary , News , Daily News |
| Website | www.spreaker.com |
| bobbycapucci@protonmail.com |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
