Explicit
The USVI And Their Reply Memo In Support To Dismiss The Epstein Survivor Suit (9/2/24)
Sep 2, 2024 ·
14m 19s
Sign up for free
Listen to this episode and many more. Enjoy the best podcasts on Spreaker!
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
Description
The Government of the United States Virgin Islands, in their reply to support the motion to dismiss, argues that the court lacks both personal and subject matter jurisdiction over them....
show more
The Government of the United States Virgin Islands, in their reply to support the motion to dismiss, argues that the court lacks both personal and subject matter jurisdiction over them. They assert that the plaintiffs have not provided sufficient factual evidence to demonstrate why the court should have jurisdiction in this case. Additionally, the government contends that even if jurisdiction were proper, the plaintiffs’ claims do not satisfy the legal requirements necessary to move forward. They argue the complaints are either too vague, improperly framed, or fail to establish a concrete legal basis for proceeding under federal law.
Moreover, the reply emphasizes procedural issues and questions the standing of the plaintiffs, arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims do not establish direct harm that would warrant court intervention. The government also points out that the claims are based on speculative allegations rather than solid, actionable facts. They conclude by urging the court to dismiss the case to prevent unnecessary litigation and uphold the integrity of legal standards that require clear, actionable claims and appropriate jurisdictional grounds.
(commercial at 9:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.158.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
show less
Moreover, the reply emphasizes procedural issues and questions the standing of the plaintiffs, arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims do not establish direct harm that would warrant court intervention. The government also points out that the claims are based on speculative allegations rather than solid, actionable facts. They conclude by urging the court to dismiss the case to prevent unnecessary litigation and uphold the integrity of legal standards that require clear, actionable claims and appropriate jurisdictional grounds.
(commercial at 9:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.158.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Information
| Author | Bobby Capucci |
| Organization | Bobby Capucci |
| Website | - |
| Tags |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
