Explicit
The USVI And Their Motion For A Partial Summary Judgement Against JP Morgan (Part 5) (8/23/24)
Aug 23, 2024 ·
10m 34s
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
Description
The case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR involves the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) against JPMorgan Chase & Co. The case primarily focuses on the allegations that JPMorgan Chase facilitated and...
show more
The case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR involves the Government of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) against JPMorgan Chase & Co. The case primarily focuses on the allegations that JPMorgan Chase facilitated and benefited from Jeffrey Epstein's illegal activities, particularly his sex trafficking enterprise.Summary of the Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
(commercial at 7:27)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
Microsoft Word - MSJ BRIEF 7.24.23 Final WORD_Highlighted Black for Redactions (courtlistener.com)
show less
- Background and Legal Context:
- The USVI government argues that JPMorgan Chase had actual knowledge of Epstein’s illegal activities and continued to provide banking services to him, thereby facilitating his operations. The bank is accused of turning a blind eye to these activities due to the lucrative business Epstein brought to the institution.
- Key Arguments:
- Knowledge and Facilitation: The memorandum emphasizes that JPMorgan Chase had ample evidence of Epstein’s illegal conduct through various suspicious transactions and internal communications. The USVI government contends that despite this knowledge, the bank continued its relationship with Epstein, making it complicit in his criminal activities.
- Financial Benefits: It is argued that JPMorgan Chase financially benefited from its relationship with Epstein, which provided significant fees and business opportunities. The USVI government claims that the bank prioritized profits over legal compliance and ethical considerations.
- Breach of Duty: The memorandum argues that JPMorgan Chase breached its duty to report suspicious activities as required under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). By failing to report Epstein’s suspicious transactions, the bank is accused of aiding and abetting his sex trafficking operations.
- Legal Standards and Precedent:
- The USVI government supports its arguments by referencing relevant legal standards and case law that outline the responsibilities of financial institutions to report and prevent illegal activities, particularly when there is clear evidence of wrongdoing.
- Request for Partial Summary Judgment:
- The USVI government is seeking a partial summary judgment, which would establish JPMorgan Chase’s liability for facilitating Epstein’s criminal enterprise without the need for a full trial. The government argues that the evidence is clear and overwhelming, and thus a trial is unnecessary to prove the bank's liability.
- Conclusion:
- The memorandum concludes by urging the court to grant the motion for partial summary judgment, holding JPMorgan Chase liable for its role in enabling Epstein's illegal activities. The USVI government asserts that this judgment is essential to ensure accountability and to prevent similar situations in the future.
(commercial at 7:27)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
Microsoft Word - MSJ BRIEF 7.24.23 Final WORD_Highlighted Black for Redactions (courtlistener.com)
Information
| Author | Bobby Capucci |
| Organization | Bobby Capucci |
| Website | - |
| Tags |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
