Explicit
Transcribed
The El Chapo Files: Memorandum Of Law in Support Of The Governments Trial Motions In Limine (Part 3) (7/29/24)
Jul 29, 2024 ·
10m 1s
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
The El Chapo Files: Memorandum Of Law in Support Of The Governments Trial Motions In Limine (Part 3) (7/29/24)
This is an automatically generated transcript. Please note that complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Description
The memorandum of law in support of the government's trial motions in limine for the El Chapo trial outlines several key points aimed at shaping the scope of evidence and...
show more
The memorandum of law in support of the government's trial motions in limine for the El Chapo trial outlines several key points aimed at shaping the scope of evidence and arguments presented during the trial:
(commercial at 6:09)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
show less
- Exclusion of Irrelevant Evidence: The government sought to exclude evidence and arguments that it deemed irrelevant to the core issues of the case. This included precluding the defense from presenting evidence that did not directly relate to the charges against Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán or that could potentially mislead the jury.
- Prior Bad Acts and Other Crimes: The government moved to admit evidence of Guzmán's prior bad acts and other crimes to demonstrate his pattern of criminal behavior. This was aimed at establishing a broader context for the charges he faced, including his leadership role in the Sinaloa Cartel and his involvement in drug trafficking and violence.
- Witness Protection and Anonymity: To protect the safety of witnesses, the government requested that certain witnesses be allowed to testify under pseudonyms and that their identities be kept confidential. This was crucial given the violent nature of Guzmán's cartel and the potential threats to the witnesses' lives.
- Limitation on Defense Arguments: The memorandum also sought to limit certain defense arguments that might distract from the primary issues or introduce unfair prejudice. For example, it aimed to restrict the defense from arguing that Guzmán was merely a scapegoat or that the charges were politically motivated without substantial evidence to support such claims.
(commercial at 6:09)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Information
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
