Explicit
Transcribed
The Downfall Of Diddy: Declaration In Opposition Of Diddy Pre Trial Release (Part 2) (10/26/24)
Oct 26, 2024 ·
12m 28s
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
The Downfall Of Diddy: Declaration In Opposition Of Diddy Pre Trial Release (Part 2) (10/26/24)
This is an automatically generated transcript. Please note that complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Description
In response to Sean Combs' appeal for pretrial release, the appellee (the prosecution) has filed an affirmation opposing the motion. The government argues that Combs poses a significant flight risk...
show more
In response to Sean Combs' appeal for pretrial release, the appellee (the prosecution) has filed an affirmation opposing the motion. The government argues that Combs poses a significant flight risk due to his vast resources, international connections, and alleged history of witness intimidation. They emphasize that the seriousness of the charges, which include sex trafficking and racketeering, increases the likelihood of Combs attempting to evade justice if released.
The prosecution also highlights concerns regarding public safety, citing allegations of ongoing criminal behavior that could continue if Combs is granted pretrial release. They argue that his wealth and influence could enable him to obstruct the investigation or intimidate witnesses, further compromising the integrity of the trial. The appellee maintains that the initial decision to deny pretrial release was justified and urges the appellate court to uphold that ruling.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.29.0.pdf
show less
The prosecution also highlights concerns regarding public safety, citing allegations of ongoing criminal behavior that could continue if Combs is granted pretrial release. They argue that his wealth and influence could enable him to obstruct the investigation or intimidate witnesses, further compromising the integrity of the trial. The appellee maintains that the initial decision to deny pretrial release was justified and urges the appellate court to uphold that ruling.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.29.0.pdf
Information
| Author | Bobby Capucci |
| Organization | Bobby Capucci |
| Website | - |
| Tags |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
