Explicit
Transcribed
Stacey Plaskett And Her Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivor Lawsuit (Part 3) (7/12/24)
Jul 12, 2024 ·
13m 41s
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
Stacey Plaskett And Her Motion To Dismiss The Epstein Survivor Lawsuit (Part 3) (7/12/24)
This is an automatically generated transcript. Please note that complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Description
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit,...
show more
Stacey Plaskett, Democrat and Delegate to Congress from the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), has been actively seeking the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. The lawsuit, which targets various officials from the USVI, accuses them of enabling Epstein's sex trafficking activities. Plaskett has described the suit as "legally and factually frivolous" and argues that the claims against her lack any substantial basis, suggesting that her inclusion is an attempt to unfairly malign her reputation due to her high profile.
Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.
What do the facts tell us?
Let's dive in and find out.
(commercial at 7:49)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
show less
Plaskett's legal team contends that the lawsuit does not meet the necessary pleading standards and that there is no evidence connecting her to Epstein's criminal activities. They argue that her interactions with Epstein, including accepting campaign donations from him, do not imply any knowledge or involvement in his illegal actions. Plaskett asserts that the lawsuit is a scattershot attempt at monetary gain, aiming to exploit her public status to increase the case's visibility and pressure for a settlement.
What do the facts tell us?
Let's dive in and find out.
(commercial at 7:49)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
Microsoft Word - 15154228_7.docx (courtlistener.com)
Information
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
