Explicit
Murder In Moscow: The Declaration Of Bryan Edelman In Support Of Bryan Kohberger (Part 1) (7/25/24)
Jul 25, 2024 ·
13m 14s
Sign up for free
Listen to this episode and many more. Enjoy the best podcasts on Spreaker!
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
Description
Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a...
show more
Dr. Bryan Edelman is a trial consultant and expert on pre-trial publicity who was involved in the Bryan Kohberger trial. Edelman was hired by Kohberger's defense team to conduct a phone survey of potential jurors in Latah County, Idaho. The purpose of the survey was to assess the impact of media coverage on public opinion about the case, which involves Kohberger being charged with the murder of four University of Idaho students.
The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.
Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.
The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.
In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.
(commercial at 9:06)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
show less
The survey, which contacted 400 residents, faced significant criticism from the prosecution. They argued that the questions were too specific and potentially spread false information, thereby contaminating the jury pool. Some questions included details not found in official affidavits, leading to concerns that the survey was prejudicing potential jurors against Kohberger.
Edelman defended his work, stating that his aim was to measure the influence of media coverage on public opinion, regardless of whether the information was true or false. He emphasized that such surveys are standard practice in high-profile cases to determine whether a fair trial can be conducted in the current venue or if a change of venue is necessary.
The controversy surrounding the survey led the judge to pause its continuation and to schedule further hearings to decide on the matter.
In this episode we take a look at his declaration filed with the court.
(commercial at 9:06)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
072224-Memorandum-Support-MCoV.pdf
Information
| Author | Bobby Capucci |
| Organization | Bobby Capucci |
| Website | - |
| Tags |
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
