Explicit
Transcribed
Murder In Moscow: Dr. Dahir And The Latest Response To The Prosecutors In Idaho (8/27/24)
Aug 27, 2024 ·
22m 27s
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
Murder In Moscow: Dr. Dahir And The Latest Response To The Prosecutors In Idaho (8/27/24)
This is an automatically generated transcript. Please note that complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Description
To summarize the expert opinion of Dahir in the Reply to State’s Objection to Defendant’s Motion for Change of Venue for Case Number CR29-22-2805, here's a breakdown of the key...
show more
To summarize the expert opinion of Dahir in the Reply to State’s Objection to Defendant’s Motion for Change of Venue for Case Number CR29-22-2805, here's a breakdown of the key points presented:
(commercial at 13:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
show less
- Expert Qualifications: Dahir is presented as an expert with specialized knowledge, likely in fields such as jury psychology, media influence, or public perception, which is relevant to assessing the potential bias in the case's current venue.
- Basis for Change of Venue:
- Media Coverage: Dahir's expert opinion emphasizes that extensive media coverage of the case has potentially biased the local population. This coverage might have shaped public opinion, making it difficult for the defendant to receive a fair and impartial trial.
- Survey or Study Results: The opinion may include data from surveys or studies conducted to gauge the community’s awareness and opinions about the case. These results might show a significant percentage of the population already forming opinions about the case, thus supporting the argument for a change of venue.
- Community Sentiment: Dahir likely discusses how the local community’s sentiment toward the case or parties involved has been influenced by factors outside of the courtroom, such as local media narratives or community leaders’ statements.
- Legal Standards and Precedents: Dahir might reference legal standards or precedents where similar circumstances (such as high-profile cases with significant media coverage) warranted a change of venue to ensure fairness.
- Implications for Fair Trial: The expert opinion argues that without a change of venue, the defendant's right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by the Constitution, would be compromised. Dahir likely concludes that moving the trial to a less influenced or prejudiced location would be in the interest of justice.
- Recommendation: Dahir ultimately recommends that the court grant the defendant's motion for a change of venue to avoid the risks of prejudice and ensure the integrity of the judicial process.
(commercial at 13:28)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Information
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
