Explicit
Transcribed
JP Morgan Responds To The USVI's Motion To Strike Affirmative Defenses (Part 2) (7/30/24)
Jul 30, 2024 ·
13m 4s
Download and listen anywhere
Download your favorite episodes and enjoy them, wherever you are! Sign up or log in now to access offline listening.
JP Morgan Responds To The USVI's Motion To Strike Affirmative Defenses (Part 2) (7/30/24)
This is an automatically generated transcript. Please note that complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Description
JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The...
show more
JP Morgan has responded to the U.S. Virgin Islands' (USVI) motion to strike several of its affirmative defenses in the ongoing lawsuit related to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operations. The bank argues that these defenses are crucial to demonstrate the alleged complicity of the USVI government in enabling Epstein’s activities.
JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein’s operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein’s ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/
The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank’s defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior.
(commercial at 8:50)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)
show less
JP Morgan contends that high-ranking USVI officials, including former First Lady Cecile de Jongh, played a role in facilitating Epstein’s operations by managing his local companies and helping spread his influence throughout the government. The bank alleges that Epstein’s ties with local political figures allowed him to receive favorable treatment, such as tax benefits and reduced oversight, despite his known criminal background/
The USVI's motion to strike these defenses is viewed by JP Morgan as an attempt to avoid exposing the government's own culpability. Conversely, the USVI argues that the bank’s defenses are baseless and are intended to deflect from its failure to act on clear signs of Epstein's criminal behavior.
(commercial at 8:50)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.610915.94.5.pdf (courtlistener.com)
Information
Copyright 2024 - Spreaker Inc. an iHeartMedia Company
