Transcribed

Freedom of Thought Conference, Panel 4: The NetChoice Problem

Jun 20, 2024 · 1h 46m 18s
Freedom of Thought Conference, Panel 4: The NetChoice Problem
Description

We know how to think about government coercion. We have ready and familiar frameworks for evaluating how government power should be exercised against the private individual. But courts and policymakers...

show more
We know how to think about government coercion. We have ready and familiar frameworks for evaluating how government power should be exercised against the private individual. But courts and policymakers increasingly are called to mediate between private actors with competing claims to liberty, and the analysis is perhaps more complex and uncertain. How should we evaluate such competing claims and what are the self-governance interests of citizens themselves? Do we have a good framework for resolving conflicting interests of corporations and natural citizens, and what role or responsibility does the state have in resolving those disputes?

Jonathan Berry, Managing Partner, Boyden Gray PLLC
James Burnham, President, Vallecito Capital, LLC
Erin Hawley, Senior Counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom
Casey Mattox, Vice President, Legal Strategy, Stand Together
Prof. Todd Zywicki, George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University
Moderator: Hon. Trevor N. McFadden, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
show less
Information
Author The Federalist Society
Organization The Federalist Society
Website -
Tags
-

Looks like you don't have any active episode

Browse Spreaker Catalogue to discover great new content

Current

Podcast Cover

Looks like you don't have any episodes in your queue

Browse Spreaker Catalogue to discover great new content

Next Up

Episode Cover Episode Cover

It's so quiet here...

Time to discover new episodes!

Discover
Your Library
Search